WHO scandal exposed: Advisors received kickbacks from H1N1 vaccine manufacturers

July 27, 2010 – 5:54 pm

Saturday, June 05, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) A stunning new report reveals that top scientists who convinced the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare H1N1 a global pandemic held close financial ties to the drug companies that profited from the sale of those vaccines. This report, published in the British Medical Journal, exposes the hidden ties that drove WHO to declare a pandemic, resulting in billions of dollars in profits for vaccine manufacturers.

Several key advisors who urged WHO to declare a pandemic received direct financial compensation from the very same vaccine manufacturers who received a windfall of profits from the pandemic announcement. During all this, WHO refused to disclose any conflicts of interests between its top advisors and the drug companies who would financially benefit from its decisions.

All the kickbacks, in other words, were swept under the table and kept silent, and WHO somehow didn’t think it was important to let the world know that it was receiving policy advice from individuals who stood to make millions of dollars when a pandemic was declared.

WHO credibility destroyed

The report was authored by Deborah Cohen (BMJ features editor), and Philip Carter, a journalist who works for the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in London. In their report, Cohen states, “…our investigation has revealed damaging issues. If these are not addressed, H1N1 may yet claim its biggest victim — the credibility of the WHO and the trust in the global public health system.”

In response to the report, WHO secretary-general Dr Margaret Chan defended the secrecy, saying that WHO intentionally kept the financial ties a secret in order to “…protect the integrity and independence of the members while doing this critical work… [and] also to ensure transparency.”

Continued: http://www.naturalnews.com/028936_WHO_vaccines.html

Tags: , , ,

Reports accuse WHO of exaggerating H1N1 threat, possible ties to drug makers

July 27, 2010 – 5:46 pm

 

 European criticism of the World Health Organization’s handling of the H1N1 pandemic intensified Friday with the release of two reports that accused the agency of exaggerating the threat posed by the virus and failing to disclose possible influence by the pharmaceutical industry on its recommendations for how countries should respond.

The WHO’s response caused widespread, unnecessary fear and prompted countries around the world to waste millions of dollars, according to one report. At the same time, the Geneva-based arm of the United Nations relied on advice from experts with ties to drug makers in developing the guidelines it used to encourage countries to stockpile millions of doses of antiviral medications, according to the second report.

The reports outlined the drumbeat of criticism that has arisen, primarily in Europe, of how the world’s leading health organization responded to the first influenza pandemic in more than four decades.

“For WHO, its credibility has been badly damaged,” wrote Fiona Godlee, the editor of the BMJ, a prominent British medical journal, that published one of the reports. “WHO must act now to restore its credibility.”

A spokesman for the WHO, along with several independent experts, however, strongly disputed the reports, saying they misrepresented the seriousness of the pandemic and the WHO’s response, which was carefully formulated and necessary given the potential threat. Continued:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/04/AR2010060403034.html

Washington Post Staff Writer 
Friday, June 4, 2010; 3:52 PM

Tags: , , ,

World Health Organization Scientists Linked to Swine Flu Vaccine Makers

July 27, 2010 – 5:40 pm

Investigation Raises Questions About WHO’s Handling of H1N1 Pandemic

 
By TODD NEALE, MedPage Today
June 5, 2010 Scientists who advised the World Health Organization on its influenza policies and recommendations—including the decision to proclaim the so-called swine flu a “pandemic” had close ties to companies that manufacture vaccines and antiviral medicines like Tamiflu, a fact that WHO did not publicly disclose.  

The links between the advisors and the companies that make money from vaccines and flu treatments were detailed in a report published online by the British medical journal BMJ, which investigated the advisors’ role in WHO’s policy.

The report by Deborah Cohen, features editor of BMJ, and Philip Carter, a journalist with the Bureau of Investigative Journalism in London, acknowledged that flu experts do “need to work with industry to develop the best possible drugs for illnesses,” but said that allowing industry experts to have a role in the formulation of public health policy was a slippery slope.

And worse, Cohen and Carter said, was the failure of WHO officials to disclose the conflicts of interest or even identify the members of its advisory committee.  http://abcnews.go.com/Health/SwineFlu/swine-flu-pandemic-world-health-organization-scientists-linked/story?id=10829940

 

Tags: , , ,

WHO faces questions over swine flu policy

July 27, 2010 – 2:58 pm

who_flu_1 

Page last updated at 12:28 GMT, Thursday, 20 May 2010 13:28 UK
By Imogen FoulkesBBC News, GenevaThe virus was first recorded in Mexico in April 2009
As the 193 member states of the World Health Organization meet in Geneva, questions over the body’s handling of the H1N1 swine flu pandemic are high on the agenda.
Some medical experts doubt whether this was really a pandemic at all.
For several years before swine flu first surfaced in Mexico in April 2009, WHO officials had been warning that a global influenza pandemic was simply a matter of time.
After major pandemics in 1918, 1957 and 1968, many flu experts believed another one was imminent. Though the recent H5N1 bird flu virus had not developed the ability to spread easily among humans, it raised concerns that a new virus might do so.
“We have seen 40 to 50 million people die in a year in previous pandemics,” explained Keiji Fukuda, who is the WHO’s assistant director general, and its special adviser on pandemic influenza.
“These are huge numbers. Our job is to get people prepared, it’s a huge challenge.”
So, even before swine flu emerged, the WHO supported member states in drawing up pandemic plans, including buying antiviral drugs, preparing mass vaccination campaigns, and developing procedures for banning public gatherings and closing schools.
By the time swine flu broke out, many countries had already introduced the plans, and some industrialised nations had even signed pre-contracts with the pharmaceutical companies to buy vaccines.

‘Mild flu’

But even as the pandemic plans were put into action, doubts had begun to surface. Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, a German doctor and former member of parliament, had been watching the spread of swine flu in Mexico City, and was puzzled at the reaction of the WHO.

Keiji Fukuda says the WHO’s job is to get people prepared

“What we experienced in Mexico who_flu_2City was a very mild flu,” he explained, “which did not kill more than usual – which killed even less people than usual.
“This was suddenly, a fast-spreading mild flu, a pandemic. But this is not the definition of a pandemic I learned, which has to be severe, with a much higher than usual death rate.”
Others also had questions. Tom Jefferson, a researcher for the international Cochrane Centre, the world’s leading independent assessor of medical interventions and medical research, claims that the WHO changed the definition of what a pandemic actually was just weeks before it declared one on 11 June last year.
“On 1 May the WHO’s global pandemic website had the old definition of an influenza pandemic, which included very large numbers of cases, complications and deaths,” he said.
“By 4 May that definition had disappeared and what remained was simply a new virus which spreads rapidly and infects very many people.”
Dr Jefferson also believes that the WHO advice put emphasis on the use of vaccines and antivirals, ahead of effective and inexpensive measures like hand-washing.

‘Potential pressure’

The WHO has struggled to offer clear answers on the question of its definition of a pandemic, partly because of its policy of keeping the identity and the deliberations of its pandemic emergency advisory committee secret.
The only known member of the committee is its chairman, Australian flu specialist John MacKenzie.

Continue reading the main story

Really the only people to benefit were the pharmaceutical companies

tes of the World Health Organization meet in Geneva, questions over the

Tags: , , , , ,

BATTLE OVER SUPPLEMENTS RAGES ON

May 15, 2010 – 2:05 pm

PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE IF YOU CARE ABOUT YOUR HEALTH

http://www.cephas-library.com/health_battle_over_supplements_rages_on.html

Tags: , , , , , ,

The FDA Shuts Down Common Infant Vaccine After Startling Discovery Posted by Dr. Mercola April 17 2010

May 13, 2010 – 7:45 pm

Posted by Dr. Mercola | April 17 2010

To hear the report click on this link:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/17/major-vaccine-suspended-due-to-contamination-with-pig-virus.aspx

“U.S. federal health authorities recommended … that doctors suspend using Rotarix, one of two vaccines licensed in the U.S. against rotavirus, saying the vaccine is contaminated with material from a pig virus,” CNN reports.

The Rotarix vaccine, which is made by GlaxoSmithKline and was approved by the FDA in 2008, has already been given to about 1 million U.S. children along with 30 million worldwide. The vaccine was found to contain DNA from porcine circovirus 1.

“The FDA learned about the contamination after an academic research team using a novel technique to look for viruses in a range of vaccines found the material in GlaxoSmithKline’s product and told the company,” FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg told CNN.

Sources:

  CNN March 22, 2010

 Dr. Mercola’s Comments:

 One million U.S. children, and about 30 million worldwide, have already received GlaxoSmithKline’s Rotarix vaccine. Now a research team has discovered it is contaminated with “a substantial amount” of DNA from a pig virus.

What is pig virus DNA doing in a vaccine intended to prevent rotavirus disease, which causes severe diarrhea and dehydration?

It’s anybody’s guess, although CNN reported that GlaxoSmitthKline detected the substance in the cell bank and the seed used to make the vaccine, “suggesting its presence from the early stages of vaccine development.”

It is actually common for vaccines to contain various animal matter, including foreign animal tissues containing genetic material (DNA/RNA), but even FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg told CNN:

“It [Pig virus DNA] should not be in this vaccine product and we want to understand how it got there.

It’s not an easy call and we spent many long hours debating the pros and cons but, because we have an alternative product and because the background rates of this disease are not so severe in this country, we felt that the judicious thing to do was to take a pause, to really ask the critical questions about what this material was doing in the vaccine, how it got there.”

Disturbing Findings in Rotarix and Two Other Common Childhood Vaccines

Dr. Eric Delwart is the researcher who, along with colleagues, made the discovery of contamination in Rotarix. Their intent was reportedly to “show that live attenuated vaccine only contained the expected viral genomes and no other,” but what they found told a different story.

Using new technology to test eight infectious attenuated viral vaccines, the results showed three of the vaccines contained “unexpected viral sequences”:

  1. A measles vaccine was found to contain low levels of the retrovirus avian leukosis virus
  2. Rotateq, Merck’s rotavirus vaccine, was found to contain a virus similar to simian (monkey) retrovirus
  3. Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKine’s rotavirus vaccine) was found to contain  “significant levels” of porcine cirovirus 1

So in their tests, nearly 40 percent of the vaccines they tested contained viral contaminants. The implications of these findings on the alleged safety of the vaccine supply remains to be seen, but clearly there is contamination occurring that was a complete surprise to researchers, health officials and vaccine manufacturers alike.

As Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), said in her commentary on the Rotarix contamination issue

“There are lots of questions about how the manufacturer of Rotarix vaccine and the FDA both missed the pig virus DNA contaminating the original seed stock and all doses of Rotarix vaccine given to more than one million American children in the past few years.

Is there state-of-the-art technology that is being used by private laboratories but not by drug companies and the FDA?

Why did the independent team of scientists, who found the contamination, notify the vaccine manufacturer first rather than also immediately reporting their finding directly to the FDA?

What about the significance of finding bird viral DNA in measles vaccine and the monkey viral DNA in RotaTeq vaccine?”

There are clearly a lot of unanswered questions right now. At the very least, it certainly makes you wonder what other “unknown” contaminants are lurking in vaccines. At worst, we could be injecting children with substances that could potentially cause serious health problems down the road.

Animal Ingredients Common in Vaccines

You should know that it is very common for vaccine manufacturers to use cells from animals and birds in their manufacturing process.

To put this in perspective, Barbara Loe Fisher has explained what animal material is par for the course in manufacturing the Rotarix vaccine for your children:

“Rotarix is a genetically engineered vaccine that GSK created by isolating human rotavirus strain infecting a child in Cincinnati and using African Green monkey kidney cells to produce the original viral seed stock from which all Rotarix vaccine has been made.

In the FDA licensing process, Rotarix had to meet certain FDA standards, that included demonstrating the vaccine was not contaminated with, for example TSE (Transmissable Spongiform Encephalopathy or “mad cow” disease, a brain wasting disease) or with cow viruses because bovine (cow) serum was used to prepare the original viral seed stock. 

Porcine trypsin, an enzyme in the pancreatic juice of a pig, was also used to make the viral seed stock.”

So the fact that Rotarix contains animal material is not a surprise … it’s the type of animal material, an unexpected variety, that has even the FDA raising their eyebrows.

Why it’s Dangerous to Have Various Animal DNA in Vaccines …

Both the FDA and GlaxoSmithKline spokespeople continue to state that no safety risk has been uncovered from the contamination, at least not yet.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, said “a substantial amount” of the DNA was found in the vaccine. But, he stressed, “there is no evidence that it causes any disease. … There is no evidence that it ever does anything.”

Dr. Paul Offit added, “The PCV1 virus they found is an orphan virus, i.e., it is not associated with disease”.

Of course there are no studies provided or have ever been done to show this, it doesn’t stop them from making these statements without any facts to back up their safety assurance, despite the fact that SV40 from monkeys has been associated with cancer in multiple studies.

History has shown that it can indeed be very dangerous when an animal virus unintentionally enters the vaccine supply.

During the 1950s and 1960s, the polio vaccine, which is still given in the United States, typically four times during a child’s first 16 months of life, was widely contaminated with the monkey virus, SV40, which had gotten into the vaccine during the manufacturing process (monkey kidney cells, where SV40 thrived, were used to develop polio vaccines).

In lab tests, the virus was found to cause several different types of cancer, including brain cancer, and now SV40 is showing up in a variety of human cancers such as lung, brain, bone and lymphatic.

According to the authors of The Virus and the Vaccine: The True Story of a Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus, Contaminated Polio Vaccine, and the Millions of Americans Exposed, leading scientists and government officials turned their heads to repeated studies showing that SV40 was in the vaccine, and even today some well-known agencies are still dismissing study results.

The virus is even showing up in children too young to have received the contaminated vaccine, and some experts are now suggesting the contaminated virus may have been in the polio vaccine up until as late as 1999.

It is because of risks like this that Barbara Loe Fisher said:

“With mounting evidence that cross-species transfer of viruses can occur, the United States should no longer be using animal tissues to produce vaccines.”

This is also the same reason why Donald Miller, a cardiac surgeon and professor of surgery at the University of Washington, suggests in his more User-Friendly Vaccination Schedule that if you choose to get your child vaccinated against polio, you request only an inactivated (dead) virus vaccine that is cultured in human cells, not monkey kidney cells. 

The United States no longer uses the live oral polio vaccine, so parents don’t really have to ask for the injected version. However, if you live internationally, this is still an issue.

Are the Benefits of Rotarix Worth the Risks?

Even without a potential contamination scare, there are serious risks to every vaccine. So before vaccinating you really need to be certain that the benefits will outweigh those risks.

In the case of Rotarix, along with RotaTeq (a similar vaccine made by Merck), the benefits are very questionable, especially if you live in the United States or another developed country.

Rotavirus is very contagious and does cause more than 500,000 deaths in young children each year, but this is mostly in developing countries. In the United States, rotavirus is responsible for only “several dozen” deaths a year, according to Hamburg.

Typically, when a child in the United States contracts rotavirus, and most do, only rest and fluids are required to recover. This infection also provides natural immunity that will protect your child for life.

As NVIC writes

“The CDC estimates that, by age 3, almost every US child has had a case of rotavirus. Once a child has been infected with a strain of rotavirus, he or she develops antibodies and is either immune for life or has a milder case if infected with that same strain in the future.

Most healthy children, who are infected with several strains of rotavirus in the first few years of life, develop lifelong natural immunity to rotavirus infection.”

The rotavirus vaccine, meanwhile, has shown little benefit for rotavirus rates in the United States. According to NVIC:

“Today, even though almost all US infants receive vaccines for rotavirus, and despite efforts to improve the management of childhood rotavirus-associated diarrhea, hospitalizations of children in the U.S. with the disease have not significantly declined in the past two decades.”

Along with showing little benefit for a disease that is typically entirely treatable with fluids and rest, a recent drug review by the FDA found that Rotarix is associated with a significant increase in pneumonia-related deaths in children, compared to a placebo. 

So with this particular vaccine, children are taking on serious risks with what appears to be very little benefit — and that was before the contamination was uncovered.

The moral of the story?

Whatever you do, please do your homework before subjecting your children to any vaccine. A great way to get started is to simply use the Search Feature at the top of each of my Web pages and search my site as it contains a litany of research on vaccine safety, and the lack thereof.

 

Related Links:

  Pulled Rotavirus Vaccine Proved Dangerous

  Vaccine Doctor Given at Least $30 Million Dollars to Push Vaccines

  Overlooked Contaminant Found in Donated Blood…

Buying and Selling in a RFID Chip for the FIRST TIME EVER – Positive ID

February 23, 2010 – 1:45 pm

chip4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Buying and Selling in a RFID Chip for the FIRST TIME EVER – Positive ID

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T4P9cEufrU&NR=1&feature=fvwp

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Kids’ Swine flu shots recalled; not strong enough

December 15, 2009 – 11:03 am

By MIKE STOBBE – AP Medical Writer -  December 15, 2009 – Kids’ Swine flu shots recalled; not strong enough Police find photos in child pornography case  Hundreds of thousands of swine flu shots for children have been recalled because tests indicate the vaccine doses lost some strength, government health officials said Tuesday.

The recall is for about 800,000 pre-filled syringes intended for young children, ages 6 months to nearly 3 years. The shots, made by Sanofi Pasteur, were distributed across the country last month and most have already been used, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Doctors were notified of the voluntary recall on Tuesday. Dr. Anne Schuchat, a CDC flu expert, stressed that parents don’t need to do anything or to worry. The vaccine is still safe, she said.

The issue is the vaccine’s strength. Tests done before the shots were shipped showed that the vaccines were strong enough. But tests done weeks later indicated the strength had fallen slightly below required levels. Why the potency dropped isn’t clear.

Children in that age group are supposed to get two doses, spaced about a month apart. Health officials don’t think children need to get vaccinated again, even if they got two doses from the same lots, said Schuchat.

Swine flu vaccine has been available since early October, and since then manufacturers have released about 95 million doses for distribution in the United States.

The recalled shots were made by Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccines division of France-based Sanofi-Aventis Group. The company reported the potency findings to the government officials and did a voluntary recall. A Sanofi Pasteur representative could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday.

Sanofi Pasteur bills itself as the No. 1 manufacturer of flu vaccines in the world. It makes flu vaccine at sites in France and in Pennsylvania.

http://www.kansascity.com/news/breaking_news/story/1632268.html

Another H1N1 Victim

December 6, 2009 – 8:51 pm

H1N1 Mounting Debilities and Deaths from H1N1 Vaccine
Posted By: Susoni
Date: Saturday, 5-Dec-2009 22:14:52
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=161957

h1n1_movie

Tags: , ,

A ‘Combo’ of H1N1, H2N2, H3N3 & H5N5 Ready to Roll for Viral Strains that Don’t Exist Yet?

December 6, 2009 – 12:09 pm

November 29, 2009 at 1:03 pm 
Tags:

These manufacturers are now packaging and advertising a vaccine that aims to protect against ALL the contributing donors to future variant recombinant strains based on these original donors, which were all part of the original viral bioweapon design (see this post). I can see right away the first thing they will go after is the new D225G strain and claim that because the D225G contains donor DNA from any or all of the four source strains, this new vaccine will then be effective against any substrain based on the four sources H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, and H5N1. DON’T BELIEVE THE HYPE. There is no way, even if these vaccines DID work against what they are advertised to protect against – which they don’t – for them to pre-concoct a MIXTURE and then claim it will be effective against recombinant substrains based on known contributing donors…. it’s just not possible. This is one of the hugest lies ever to be perpetrated on the masses by big pharma and governments, and anyone knowingly caught up in selling these lies should be sought after, tried, and punished accordingly.

Turns out these “DNA Vaccines” are exactly what Dr. Bill Deagle predicted would somehow come about in one form of this bioweapon, in the form of epigenetic switching mechanisms, that once they get into the host organism (ie YOU), it begins to transform the host DNA and cause changes to the organism beyond its normal scope of existence. This could cause one set of epigenetic switches to work on certain groups of people but not others, depending on similar genetic characteristics pertinent to the applicable switch in question. In the words of Dr. Bill Deagle, this leads to GMPs, or genetically-modified people, a tiny bit similar to what can happen to someone who eats genetically modified and irradiated food, but magnified and on steroids with a serious attitude. DNA vaccines are likely to be one of the most horror-stricken contributions to this bioweapon pandemic nightmare of the NWO, and are directly capable of fast-tracking the eugenics program of population reduction to a degree i’d rather not think about. -ed]

H1N1, H2N2, H3N2, and H5N1 Combo DNA Influenza Vaccine Ready to roll out.
http://gdsajj.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/h1n1-h2n2-h3n2-and-h5n1-combo-dna-influenza-vaccine-ready/

CLAIM:
…ferrets immunized with Inovio’s SynConTM universal flu vaccine combinations were 100% protected against death and sickness in a challenge with the A/H1N1 (2009) swine-origin influenza. Dr. Niranjan Y. Sardesai, Inovio’s SVP, Research and Development, presented this data at the Influenza Congress USA 2009 in Washington, DC, in a presentation titled, “Development of Universal SynCon™ DNA Vaccines for Pandemic and Seasonal Influenza.”  Blog continued:

http://labvirus.wordpress.com/2009/11/29/the-newest-of-the-deadly-vaccines-designed-to-be-a-combo-for-viral-strains-that-dont-even-exist-yet-now-thats-quite-a-feat-of-modern-medicine-considering-how-utterly-ridiculous-and/

 

Tags: